encoder和decoder的区别_decode作用

I’ve never been sure that I understand the difference between str/unicode decode and encode.

I know that str().decode() is for when you have a string of bytes that you know has a certain character encoding, given that encoding name it will return a unicode string.

I know that unicode().encode() converts unicode chars into a string of bytes according to a given encoding name.

But I don’t understand what str().encode() and unicode().decode() are for. Can anyone explain, and possibly also correct anything else I’ve gotten wrong above?

EDIT:

Several answers give info on what .encode does on a string, but no-one seems to know what .decode does for unicode.

解决方案

The decode method of unicode strings really doesn’t have any applications at all (unless you have some non-text data in a unicode string for some reason — see below). It is mainly there for historical reasons, i think. In Python 3 it is completely gone.

unicode().decode() will perform an implicit encoding of s using the default (ascii) codec. Verify this like so:

>>> s = u’ö’

>>> s.decode()

Traceback (most recent call last):

File “”, line 1, in

UnicodeEncodeError: ‘ascii’ codec can’t encode character u’\xf6′ in position 0:

ordinal not in range(128)

>>> s.encode(‘ascii’)

Traceback (most recent call last):

File “”, line 1, in

UnicodeEncodeError: ‘ascii’ codec can’t encode character u’\xf6′ in position 0:

ordinal not in range(128)

The error messages are exactly the same.

For str().encode() it’s the other way around — it attempts an implicit decoding of s with the default encoding:

>>> s = ‘ö’

>>> s.decode(‘utf-8’)

u’\xf6′

>>> s.encode()

Traceback (most recent call last):

File “”, line 1, in

UnicodeDecodeError: ‘ascii’ codec can’t decode byte 0xc3 in position 0:

ordinal not in range(128)

Used like this, str().encode() is also superfluous.

But there is another application of the latter method that is useful: there are encodings that have nothing to do with character sets, and thus can be applied to 8-bit strings in a meaningful way:

>>> s.encode(‘zip’)

‘x\x9c;\xbc\r\x00\x02>\x01z’

You are right, though: the ambiguous usage of “encoding” for both these applications is… awkard. Again, with separate byte and string types in Python 3, this is no longer an issue.